In a survey of 504 health EPZ 6438 professionals, they found that 51.9% of providers agreed or strongly agreed that “antidiarrheals keep toxins or pathogens inside of you where

they do more damage to the gut” while 53.8% agreed or strongly agreed that “antidiarrheals prolong illness by delaying excretion of the pathogen.”16 Concern has been raised that the use of loperamide and antibiotics in dysentery infections can precipitate shock and enterocolitis;20,21 however, the data supporting this concern have been in pediatric patients and have not been observed as a risk in infected adults. The use of antimotility agents combined with antibiotics in severe diarrhea and dysentery remains controversial with most guidelines advocating against use of antimotility agents, although at least one small study found no adverse treatment effects in a population being treated for bacillary dysentery.24 Additional well-controlled studies treating

all-type ambulatory diarrhea (including dysentery and inflammatory types) should be conducted to evaluate safety and efficacy of combined regimens. While practice patterns among all providers were not found to be consistent with current management guidelines, AG-014699 chemical structure we identified three practitioner characteristics which appear to be related to relatively better scoring on the treatment scenarios posed in this study; having and MD/DO, greater knowledge about TD epidemiology/etiology, and favorable attitudes toward the safety and effectiveness of antimotility agents and antibiotics. This is the first study which has evaluated the effect of practitioner type on treatment of TD. While lower than the overall provider average, physician assistants scored relatively higher on the scenario responses compared to nurses and medics/independent duty corpsman. Given that these allied health professionals are important frontline providers, improvements in education and training of these provider types should

be a priority. Although providers who reported recent TD training did not score significantly higher than those who had not received any training, it is encouraging that we were able to identify improved scores among providers who had a better understanding of TD etiology and more favorable attitudes toward the safety PRKACG and usefulness of antimotility agents and antibiotics. This finding suggests that improved education of providers of all levels on what is causing TD and what field efficacy studies have demonstrated should increase provider performance and ultimately result in more effective management and reduction of duty time lost. An expert review of TD literature performed by DuPont and colleagues recommended pretravel education as an important means of combating TD.22 Increasing provider’s knowledge of management and treatment of TD should also translate to improved pretravel guidance directed toward patients traveling to high risk areas.