Morgan EA, Schneider JG, Baroni TE, Uluckan O, Heller E, Hurchla

Morgan EA, Schneider JG, Baroni TE, Uluckan O, Heller E, Hurchla MA, Deng H, Floyd D, Berdy A, Prior JL, Piwnica-Worms D, Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP, Weilbaecher KN (2010) Berzosertib cost Dissection of platelet and myeloid cell defects by conditional targeting of the beta 3-integrin subunit. FASEB J 24:1117–1127PubMedCrossRef 32. Yarali N, Fisgin T, Duru F, Kara A (2003) Osteopetrosis and Glanzmann’s thrombasthenia GS-4997 clinical trial in a child. Ann Hematol 82:254–256PubMed 33. Tothill P, Laskey MA, Orphanidou CI, van WM (1999) Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body

bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments. Br J Radiol 72:661–669PubMed 34. Weigert J, Cann C (1999) Dual-energy X-ray absorpitometry (DXA) in obese patients. Are normal values really normal? J Womens Imaging 1:11–17 35. Department of Health (1999) Health survey for England: cardiovascular disease. Stationery Office, London 36. Lawlor DA, Bedford C, Taylor M, Ebrahim S (2003) Geographical variation in cardiovascular disease, risk factors, check details and their control in older women: British Women’s Heart and Health Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:134–140PubMedCrossRef

37. Mascie-Taylor CG (1987) Assortative mating in a contemporary British population. Ann Hum Biol 14:59–68PubMedCrossRef 38. Blake GM, Parker JC, Buxton FM, Fogelman I (1993) Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans. Br J Radiol 66:902–906PubMedCrossRef”
“Dear Editor, I and my co-authors acknowledge the many challenges of clinical studies of nutrients such as vitamin D [1], and appreciate that Dr Heaney [2] seems to agree with the limitations of our study as already pointed out in the discussion section of our paper [3]. Hopefully, ongoing or future studies will overcome these problems. Conflicts of interest None. References 1. Heaney RP (2008) Nutrition, endpoints and the problem of proof. J Nutr 138(9):1591–1595PubMed 2. Heaney RP (2011) The effect of vitamin D dose on bone mineral

density. Osteoporos Int. doi:10.​1007/​s00198-011-1844-2 3. Grimnes G, Joakimsen R, Figenschau Y, Torjesen PA, Almås B, Jorde R (2011) The effect of Cyclin-dependent kinase 3 high-dose vitamin D on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass − a randomized controlled 1-year trial. Osteoporos Int. doi:10.​1007/​s00198-011-1752-5, Epub ahead of print 10 September 2011″
“Introduction Osteoporosis is a bone disorder characterised by low bone density associated with a deterioration in bone quality (architecture, turnover, damage accumulation, and mineralization) resulting in an increase in bone fragility [1]. This leads to an increase in the risk of fractures, particularly of the hip and vertebrae, which is associated with elevated morbidity and mortality [2–4]. Osteoporosis affects one woman in three after menopause [5] and is recognised by the WHO as a major public health problem for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Comments are closed.