05), although the decreases were small. As W862 differed from W861 only in the replacement of lamina tobacco with BT tobacco ( Table 1), these data suggest that the use of tobacco treated to remove some of the protein resulted in a small, but consistent, decrease in mutagenic potency with one tester strain. Furthermore, the mutagenicity of W863 PM in strain TA98 with S9 was consistently lower than those of W860 and W861. This is probably unrelated to the filter additives in W861 and W863, because charcoal and CR20 have no effect on PM ( Baker,

1999). The more likely explanation is the inclusion of 80% BT tobacco in W863. Reduced TA98 mutagenicities were observed for W862 and W863, but not with W864. W862 and W863 contained 80% BT tobacco. W864 contained 40% BT tobacco. This indicates that the reduction in bacterial mutagenicity is related to the amount of BT tobacco used. The BT process involving protease GPCR & G Protein inhibitor this website digestion and water extraction, used to prepare the tobacco for the test samples, was shown

to remove more than half (59%) of the protein nitrogen, and more than 40% of the total polyphenols from flue-cured tobacco, while 12% of the nicotine is lost and total sugars are increased by 14% (Liu et al., 2011). The reduction in nitrogen would be expected to decrease mutagenicity (Mizusaki et al., 1977). The treated tobacco also contained 1.9% glycerol, which was added during the process, while the untreated tobacco contained 0.21%. While the differences in glycerol content would not be expected to alter toxicity or genotoxicity, the considerable reduction in protein nitrogen should result in the generation of lower levels of aromatic and heterocyclic amine protein combustion products, generated on smoking, and considered to be the main cause of mutagenicity in SAL (DeMarini, 2004 and Van Duuren et al., 1960). The BT process reduced the level of aromatic amines in smoke (Liu et al., 2011). Previous observations

on flue-cured or burley tobacco treated in a similar way to that used for the present experiments, resulted in an attenuation of mutagenicity of the resultant PMs in strains TA98 (80%) and TA100 (50%) (Clapp et al., 1999). A detailed Ergoloid assessment of the analysis of smoke products from the tobaccos used by Clapp et al. (1999) would be required to account for the discrepancies in the biological data. However, it is noteworthy that the process used by Clapp et al. (1999) with protease digestion removed about 70% of the protein nitrogen from their reconstituted tobacco, and, moreover, they did not report on any other changes in constituents. Overall, the results indicate that four in vitro tests, three of them genotoxicity assays, found no qualitative differences between PM samples obtained by individually smoking two reference cigarettes and five samples of cigarettes with different tobacco blends and filters, some of which contained tobacco treated to reduce levels of protein nitrogen ( Table 8).