, 2008) However, DRGs in E10 5 Erk1/2CKO(Wnt1) embryos appear to

, 2008). However, DRGs in E10.5 Erk1/2CKO(Wnt1) embryos appear to be morphologically Selleck RG-7204 intact (see Figures S1A and

S1B available online). ERK1/2 expression is significantly reduced in the DRG by E10.5, and western blotting of E12.5 Erk1/2CKO(Wnt1) or Mek1/2CKO(Wnt1) DRG lysates shows a near-complete loss of ERK1/2 or MEK1/2 protein, respectively ( Figures S1C–S1E). RSK3, a downstream substrate of ERK1/2, showed significantly reduced phosphorylation further indicating functional inactivation of ERK1/2 signaling ( Figure S1E). We therefore utilized Erk1/2CKO(Wnt1) mice to ask whether the loss of Erk1/2 disrupts PNS development in vivo. Compared to controls ( Figures 1A and 1C), massive cell loss was observed at both brachial and lumber levels in E17.5 Erk1/2CKO(Wnt1) DRGs ( Figures 1B, 1D, and S1F–S1J). We found that homozygous deletion of both genes was necessary for the decreased neuronal number in the DRG (data not shown). E17.5 Mek1/2CKO(Wnt1) embryos show a qualitatively similar, though more severe phenotype, than in stage matched Erk1/2CKO(Wnt1) embryos ( Figures S1F–S1H). Endogenous levels

of MEK1/2 protein are reported to be lower than ERK1/2, likely resulting in more Selleck Dasatinib rapid protein clearance following recombination and a relatively accelerated phenotypic onset ( Ferrell, 1996). Whole-mount neurofilament immunolabeling of E15.5 control and Erk1/2CKO(Wnt1) forelimbs revealed that nearly all peripheral projections are absent in mutant forelimbs ( Figures 1E and 1F). It is notable that motor neurons do not undergo recombination in the Wnt1:Cre line, yet their projections totally degenerate. Overall, these data demonstrate that inactivation of Erk1/2 in the PNS results in the loss of all peripheral projections and massive DRG neuron death. ERK5 is another well-known stimulus-dependent MAPK under trophic control during PNS development (Watson et al., 2001). We tested the role of this pathway in Erk5fl/fl Wnt1:Cre (Erk5CKO(Wnt1)) mice ( Figure S1K–S1N).

Oxalosuccinic acid In contrast to Erk1/2CKO(Wnt1) mice, Erk5CKO(Wnt1) mice are viable and able to breed. However, Erk5CKO(Wnt1) adult mice are smaller than controls and exhibit external ear truncation and mandibular shortening, likely due to an alteration in the development of the craniofacial neural crest ( Figure S1M). Perhaps surprisingly, markers for proprioceptive (Parvalbumin) and nociceptive (CGRP and TrkA) sensory neurons, exhibited relatively normal expression in P1 Erk5CKO(Wnt1) DRGs ( Figures 1G–1J and data not shown). Whole-mount neurofilament immunolabeling did not reveal any deficit in the peripheral projections of E14.5 Erk5CKO(Wnt1) forelimbs compared to controls ( Figures 1K–1L). Both CGRP and Parvalbumin positive central afferents within the spinal cord appeared intact as well ( Figures 1G–1J). Overall, these data suggest that ERK5 does not play a primary role in early aspects of PNS morphogenesis in vivo.

Comments are closed.