(C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“The

central disturbance in anorexia nervosa (AN) is a distorted body image. This perceptual error does not extend to judging others’ body shapes. We used fMRI to examine if the brain processing of an image of self is different in the brains of AN patients. The sample comprised 10 patients with AN and 10 healthy control Talazoparib nmr women. In a controlled epoch design, subjects were presented with images of self and non-self, matched for body mass index (BMI), in a counter-balanced fashion, and echoplanar images with blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast were obtained on a 3T Philips scanner. Processing of non-self-images by control subjects activated the inferior and middle frontal gyri, superior and inferior parietal lobules, posterior lobe of the cerebellum and the thalamus. Patients had a similar pattern of activation with greater activation in the medial frontal gyrus. When the two groups were contrasted for the differential activation

with self vs. non-self-images, control subjects had greater activation than patients in the middle frontal gyri, insula, precuneus, and occipital regions while the patients did not have greater activation in any region. AN patients had no significant regions of activation with self-images compared to baseline. We conclude YAP-TEAD Inhibitor 1 purchase that AN patients process non-self-images similarly to control subjects, but their processing of self-images is quite discrepant, with a lack of activation of the attentional system or the insula. Such discrepant emotional and perceptual OTX015 ic50 processing may underlie the distortion of self-images by AN patients. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“A common view is that visual processing within the ventral visual stream is modulated by attention and awareness. We used fMRI adaptation to investigate whether activation in a network of brain regions involved with face recognition – namely the fusiform face

area (FFA), occipital face area (OFA) and right superior temporal sulcus (rSTS) – was modulated by physical changes to face stimuli or by observers’ awareness of the changes. We sequentially presented two matrices of four faces. In two thirds of the trials one of the faces changed. We compared activations generated in three conditions (i) change detected trials, (ii) change blind trials, and (iii) no change trials. If face areas were sensitive to physical changes then we expected similar levels of activation for face changes regardless of change detection. If face areas were sensitive to levels of awareness of change then we expected greater levels of activation for detected changes compared to no change detection. We found that all three-face regions recovered from adaptation when subjects were aware of changes, but only OFA recovered from adaptation when subjects were not aware of the changes.