Conversely, a lack of comparator data for ZDV monotherapy and potential toxicities arising from ZDV use www.selleckchem.com/products/gkt137831.html may limit the relevance of these data. Of note, further to peripheral toxicities, which are well described with ZDV use, biomarker data suggest there may also be CNS toxicities associated with the use of ZDV-containing regimens [18]. In summary, we recommend patients with NC impairment start standard combination ART regimens and the choice should be determined, as with other patients, by different factors, including baseline

VL, side effect profile, tolerability, DDIs and patient preference. Novel ARV strategies, including protease-inhibitor monotherapy continue to be assessed in clinical trials as cost-beneficial treatment regimens with the potential for reduced long-term toxicities. Concerns have been raised regarding the cerebral effects of PI monotherapy [19], with such concerns based on the hypotheses that PI monotherapy comprises only one effective ARV agent that may not adequately suppress ongoing HIV replication in sanctuary sites such as the CNS, and on pharmacokinetic modelling that suggests that not all PIs have optimal penetration across the blood–brain barrier [13]. Furthermore, isolated cases describing the evolution of CNS disease in previously stable HIV-positive subjects Selleck Quizartinib receiving PI monotherapy have been reported [20]. One study was specifically

designed to assess the cerebral effects of LPV/r monotherapy [21]; however, it was terminated early due to a lack of efficacy in the plasma compartment. Although cases of CNS disease were reported within this study, such results must be interpreted with caution as virological endpoints in the plasma compartment were not met and therefore

such cases may be driven by poor ARV efficacy per se, rather than distinct CNS disease itself [22]. In the MONET study assessing DRV/r vs. standard therapy, no differences in patient-reported cognitive function are observed between the study treatment arms over 3 years of therapy Ureohydrolase [23]. Although reassuring, these data represent changes in patient-reported observations rather than observations from formal neuropsychological testing. Interestingly, in a small substudy within MONET, improvements in detailed neuropsychological testing and improvements in cerebral biomarkers measured via imaging techniques, were reported in both treatment arms [24]. In the ongoing UK PIVOT study, detailed neuropsychological testing is being assessed prospectively in subjects on PI monotherapy vs. standard therapy, the results of which will be of great interest to this field. Given the above theoretical concerns regarding the CNS activity of PI monotherapy, and for the majority of HIV-positive subjects it may be possible to select other ARV regimens, we suggest this approach is currently avoided in neurologically symptomatic subjects.