Clusters of group III and group III-like high-level resistant isolates were recently observed in Norway (Skaare et al., manuscript in preparation). The current epidemiologic situation in Europe and Canada, with a gradually increase in low-rPBP3 and sporadic reports of high-rPBP3 isolates, strongly resembles the situation in Japan click here and South Korea prior to the shifts in resistance genotypes. Continuous monitoring of susceptibility to cefotaxime and meropenem is
necessary to ensure safe empiric treatment. Molecular epidemiology By comparing the study isolates with isolates from a comparable population collected in 2004 [11], we were able to study the clonal dynamics of PBP3-mediated resistance. The increasing prevalence of rPBP3 in Norway is due to expansion of a few clones. Four STs with characteristic ftsI alleles accounted for 61% of the rPBP3 isolates in the present study. Two of these strains were the main contributors to PBP3-mediated resistance in Norway
three years earlier [11]. Interestingly, the replacement of ST14 by ST367 as the most prevalent rPBP3 strain did not cause a shift in PBP3 type nor phylogroup, as both STs carried PBP3 type A and selleckchem belong to eBURST group 2. We have previously https://www.selleckchem.com/products/sbe-b-cd.html suggested the existence of one or more widely disseminated rPBP3 clones [11]. This is supported by later reports of PBP3 type A and compatible substitution patterns (identical to PBP3 type A as far as comparison is possible) being common in Europe [4, 18, 23–25], Canada [3, 12], Australia [20] and South Korea [16, 22], and by the present study. PBP3 type A is frequently linked to ST14 and ST367 in the limited
number of previous reports on the molecular epidemiology of rPBP3. Studies on invasive H. influenzae in Canada in the periods 2000–2006 [2, 12, 42] and Amisulpride 2008–2009 [3] revealed an increasing prevalence of rPBP3 in NTHi, with PBP3 type A being common in both sampling periods [3, 12]. ST14 and ST367, respectively, were the most common STs in NTHi from two different regions and sampling periods [3, 42]. PBP3 type A was by far the most frequent substitution pattern in ST14 and also appeared in some ST367 isolates (R. Tsang, personal communication). Furthermore, a study on invasive H. influenzae in Sweden [4] identified a cluster of seven NTHi isolates of ST14 and related STs (hereunder ST367), all carrying PBP3 type A and collected in the period 2008–2010 (F. Resman, personal communication). Finally, in two recently published Spanish studies, ST14 and/or ST367 isolates with substitution patterns compatible with PBP3 type A were reported in invasive disease (ST367, n = 2) [24] and pneumonia (ST14, n = 2; ST367, n = 1) [25] in the period 2000–2009.